• AWWA ACE68911
Provide PDF Format

Learn More

AWWA ACE68911

  • Getting the Most from Your Brackish Groundwater: Treating RO Brine to Increase Recovery and Reduce Volume for Disposal
  • Conference Proceeding by American Water Works Association, 11/01/2008
  • Publisher: AWWA

$12.00$24.00


Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), located in southern California, recently completed two brine treatment studies, one for the California Department ofWater Resources (DWR) and the other for the United States Department of Interior, Bureau ofReclamation (USBR). These studies investigated the cost of different alternative processtreatment trains to recover additional usable water from primary reverse osmosis (RO) brine,and either reduce the volume of brine significantly, or go to complete zero-liquid discharge(ZLD). The studies included pilot scale, bench scale and desktop evaluations of bothestablished and emerging technologies for brine treatment. Chemical softening of primary RObrine followed by either a second RO process or electrodialysis reversal (EDR) is an example ofso-called established technologies; emerging technologies investigated included membranedistillation (MD), forward osmosis (FO) and seeded reverse osmosis. A 50-gpm chemicalsoftening process was operated for 6-months and provided feed water to RO and EDR pilotunits. MD and FO were tested at bench scale, and seeded RO was operated in a batch pilot plant.Capital and operation and maintenance (O&M) cost estimates were established for several treatment configurationsthat also included brine concentration, crystallization and pond evaporation. These were thencompared. Overall, total annual costs for 14 different treatment train combinations weregenerally within about 10-percent of each other. Treatment for removal and recovery of salablesalt byproducts was, however, more costly, probably because of the capital costs associatedwith selective precipitation and washing and processing of the salts. Treatment trains thatincluded a third concentration step (using the seeded RO process) ahead of thermal mechanicalevaporation appeared to have slightly lower overall costs. This is attributed to the reduced sizeof the thermal evaporation process. Additional work on MD, FO and the seeded RO processesis needed. Includes 4 references, tables, figure.

Related Products

AWWA ACE91023

AWWA ACE91023

T10 Determinations in a Variety of Clearwells and Standpipes Using Fluoride as a Tracer..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA DSS60349

AWWA DSS60349

Desk-Top Analysis of Blending an Undisinfected Groundwater with Treated Surface Water..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA ACE54421

AWWA ACE54421

Self Evaluation and Capacity Development in Small Systems..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA IMTECH64737

AWWA IMTECH64737

Case Study: Developing a GIS Data Set for Pipeline Prioritization and Replacement, Dallas Water Util..

$12.00 $24.00